Measuring Surface Cleanliness: Methods, Pros, and Cons

Maintaining a clean and hygienic environment is essential for various industries, from food production to healthcare. Surface cleanliness can be measured in various ways, depending on the materials of the surface, cleanliness level needed, accuracy, reliability and industry practice. To ensure that surfaces are adequately cleaned, it's crucial to employ reliable and accurate methods for measuring cleanliness. In this blog post, we will explore common methods used to assess surface cleanliness, discussing their pros, cons, and applications.

Visual Assessment
In our daily lives, the basic method for determining surface cleanliness is visual inspection. While simple and straightforward, this approach has limitations. Factors such as surface color, material, and the inspector's distance from the surface can affect accuracy. Additionally, visual assessment is subjective and may not detect microscopic contaminants.

Wiping Inspection
Another simple and straightforward method with a white, clean cloth or gloveā€¦ However, it is still arbitrary to determine the cleanliness level in this way.

Water Break Test
The water break test involves spraying surfaces with water to assess cleanliness. This method is suitable for metal surfaces but may not be feasible for other materials like electronics and fabrics. While it can provide a quick indication of surface cleanliness, it has limited applications.

Low Power Microscope Inspection
Using a low power microscope, certain levels of cleanliness can be determined. However, this method requires laboratory conditions and may not be practical for on-site assessments.

UV Light
Ultraviolet light is effective in detecting the presence of chemical substances like bodily fluids. However, it can be misled by chemicals containing optical brighteners, leading to false positives.

Tape Test
The tape test involves using adhesive tape to collect dust and particles from a surface. The tape is then examined under a magnified glass to assess cleanliness. While this method is useful for checking dust and other particles, it requires specific types of adhesive tape and may not provide a comprehensive assessment of surface cleanliness.

Aerobic Plate Count
Aerobic plate count is a laboratory method that provides a specific and comparable test outcome of micro-organisms on a surface. However, this method can take at least two weeks to deliver results, making it impractical for real-time monitoring.

ATP Testing
Adenosine triphosphate (ATP) testing has emerged as a popular and effective method for measuring surface cleanliness. ATP is a biomarker that can detect bio-contamination and overall cleanliness in various sectors, including food industries, schools, and clinics. A commercial portable ATP measuring device, known as a luminometer, converts microbial ATP into bioluminescence material through biochemical reactions. The intensity of the luminescence signal is then measured to reflect the relative content of biomass. ATP testing is rapid, real-time, quantitative, and economical, making it an attractive option for many industries.

Common ATP Devices and Their Differences
Several ATP luminometer brands are available in the market, each with unique features and capabilities. Some of the common brands in Hong Kong include Kikkoman, 3M, and Hygiena. These devices differ in terms of the substances they detect (ATP, ADP, AMP), light detection technology (photomultiplier or photodiode), swab design (dry or pre-wet), consistency of results, and ability to detect low concentrations of bacteria.

[1] https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0099951

[2]ditto

Photomultiplier vs. Photodiode Detectors
ATP luminometers employ either photomultiplier or photodiode detectors to measure the bioluminescence signal. Photomultiplier detectors are highly efficient in capturing photons and can count individual photons, making them more sensitive and tolerant to temperature variations. They are mainly used in medical-grade diagnostic devices. On the other hand, photodiode detectors are compact, lightweight, consume less energy, and have a longer lifetime. However, their detection is affected by external temperature. Photodiode detectors are primarily used in domestic devices.

Choosing the Right Method
When selecting a method for measuring surface cleanliness, consider factors such as the materials of the surface, the required cleanliness level, accuracy, reliability, and industry practice. ATP testing has proven to be a versatile and efficient method for various applications, offering real-time, quantitative results. However, it's essential to understand the differences between ATP luminometer brands and their detection technologies to ensure optimal performance and consistent results.

At Avalon Steritech, we specialize in providing comprehensive indoor environmental health solutions, including surface cleanliness assessment. Our team of experts can help you choose the most appropriate method for your specific needs and provide guidance on implementing effective cleaning and monitoring protocols. Contact us today to learn more about how we can assist you in maintaining a clean, healthy, and safe environment.

Previous
Previous

Effective Sampling Strategies for Assessing Environmental Hygiene